Guides

How to choose an election and campaign analytics tool

This category bundles two different jobs — election-night results and voter-file targeting. Work out which one you need before you compare vendors.

"Election and campaign analytics" covers two jobs that share a subject but almost nothing else: explaining what happened on election night, and helping a campaign decide who to contact before it. Newsrooms and researchers need the first. Campaigns, PACs, unions, and advocacy groups need the second. Nobody outside those groups needs to buy into this category at all — if you just want to follow results, published news coverage already does the job these vendors sell to newsrooms in the first place.

Decide which job you're buying for

Explaining the electorate and calling races. AP VoteCast is a large-scale survey run jointly by the AP and NORC that replaces traditional exit polling, explaining who voted, how, and why. Decision Desk HQ delivers real-time, county-level results and race projections, competing directly with AP's own results operation. Both are data-licensing products built for newsrooms, media platforms, and researchers — not for campaigns trying to win votes.

Targeting and mobilizing voters. Catalist, L2, NGP VAN, and TargetSmart all start from a national voter file and layer modeled or consumer data on top, so a campaign can build target lists, score persuadability and turnout likelihood, and run or measure a program. These are the tools a campaign's data or field team lives in, not something a newsroom licenses for election night.

Buying the wrong one wastes a budget on the wrong workflow entirely — a campaign doesn't need Decision Desk HQ's race calls, and a newsroom doesn't need Catalist's turnout modeling.

Partisan alignment decides your shortlist before features do

This is the fact that separates this category from almost every other one in this directory: three of the four voter-data vendors here are not politically neutral, and they say so. Catalist, NGP VAN, and TargetSmart each position themselves explicitly around Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations. L2 is the outlier: it markets and sells its voter and consumer data broadly across the political spectrum, serving Republican, Democratic, and nonpartisan clients alike.

If you're a Democratic or progressive campaign, all four are plausible; the choice comes down to scope and workflow, covered below. If you need politically neutral data infrastructure — a nonpartisan research project, a civic organization, or a campaign outside that alignment — L2 is effectively the only one of the four built to sell to you.

What you're actually buying: raw file, modeled overlay, or full platform

A voter file by itself is public registration data — name, address, party registration, vote history. What each vendor adds on top is the product:

  • Consumer and demographic appends. Modeled attributes like likely income, interests, or household composition, layered onto the base file.
  • Turnout and persuadability scores. predictive analytics models estimating how likely someone is to vote and how likely they are to be moved by contact — this is what catalist, l2, and TargetSmart all sell as a core feature.
  • A full operating platform. NGP VAN goes further than a data vendor: its VAN voter file is the shared backbone that fundraising, compliance reporting, canvassing, and email tools all read from and write back to in one system, rather than a dataset you pipe into your own tools.
  • Execution, not just data. TargetSmart extends into paid media buying across connected TV, audio, and display — a workflow step beyond what a pure data vendor like L2 offers.

Decide whether you need a data source to feed your own systems, or an integrated platform to run the campaign inside.

How pricing works in this category

Every vendor here is quote-only, with no published price list — normal for data-licensing and campaign-software deals sized to the client and the election cycle. The one disclosed figure in the category is NGP VAN's processing fee on fundraising transactions (3.25%), separate from its platform subscription cost. Expect pricing that scales with the size of your target universe, the number of users, and how many modules (fundraising, compliance, canvassing) you license together. Budget for the fact that a campaign's needs — and therefore its bill — can change sharply between an off-year and a general election.

A shortlist by situation

  • You're a newsroom or platform that needs real-time results. Decision Desk HQ for live county-level data and race calls; AP VoteCast if what you actually need is electorate research — who voted and why — rather than results themselves.
  • You're a Democratic or progressive campaign that wants one integrated system. NGP VAN, since fundraising, compliance, and canvassing all share its voter file.
  • You need turnout and persuasion modeling without committing to a full platform. Catalist or TargetSmart, both aligned progressive vendors with strong modeling.
  • You need voter data that isn't tied to one side of the aisle. L2 is the nonpartisan option in this group.

Questions to ask vendors

  1. Is this vendor's client base aligned with one party, and does that match who I'm working for?
  2. Is the price for raw data, modeled scores, or a full platform — and what happens to my cost if I add modules later?
  3. How often is the underlying voter file refreshed, and how is it reconciled after each election?
  4. If I already use NGP VAN or another platform, does this vendor's data import cleanly, or does it require rebuilding lists?
  5. For results providers: what's the sourcing and verification process behind a race call, and how does it compare with how AP itself calls races?

Common mistakes

Signing with a voter-data vendor without checking its political alignment, then discovering mid-cycle that it doesn't serve your side. Treating a turnout or persuadability score as ground truth rather than a model with its own error — these scores are built from predictive analytics, not certainty. And conflating the results/electorate-research side of this category with the targeting side; they're sold to different buyers for different jobs, even though they share a topic.

For head-to-head detail, see Catalist vs L2 and NGP VAN vs TargetSmart, or browse every tool in this category.

Related tools

Terms used in this guide

Latest on this topic