Glossary

Litigation analytics

Using data on past case outcomes, judges, and courts to inform legal strategy, such as predicting how a case might proceed.

Litigation analytics applies quantitative analysis to court records, dockets, and case filings — for example, how a particular judge tends to rule on a type of motion, typical time-to-resolution for a case type, or the track record of opposing counsel.

It relies on structured or extracted data from court filings, often using named-entity recognition and text analytics to pull structured facts — parties, judge, motion type, outcome — out of unstructured legal text at scale, then applies descriptive statistics or predictive analytics to surface patterns across many cases.

It helps law firms and in-house counsel set realistic expectations with clients, decide where to litigate, choose counsel, and estimate case duration and cost. It differs from e-discovery, which is about finding and reviewing evidence within a specific case, and from contract analytics, which examines existing agreements rather than litigation history. A common pitfall: outcomes are strongly shaped by case-specific facts that aggregate statistics can't capture, so litigation analytics informs strategy and probability, not a guaranteed prediction of how a specific case will be decided.

Last reviewed September 22, 2026

In the index now

Related terms

Related tools

Related guides