Compare

LiveRamp vs TransUnion TruAudience

LiveRamp is a network-and-identifier play built for connecting to advertising partners; TruAudience is a bureau-backed graph with measurement built in.

Side by side

LiveRamp TransUnion TruAudience
Vendor LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. TransUnion
Pricing model Quote only Quote only
Free tier No No
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Open source No No
Best for Brands needing one consistent, privacy-conscious identifier to connect CRM data to advertising and measurement partners. Advertisers wanting an identity graph backed by a large offline consumer data asset, with attribution built in.
Pricing

Enterprise pricing quoted per engagement; no public price list.

Pricing has not been verified yet — see the vendor's site.

Enterprise pricing quoted per engagement; no public price list.

Pricing has not been verified yet — see the vendor's site.

Features
  • RampID pseudonymous identity resolution
  • Cross-channel, cross-device identity matching
  • Partner network for reach and data enrichment
  • Onboarding of offline/CRM data into digital identifiers
  • Consent and governance controls for data use
  • Integration with LiveRamp Clean Room for collaborative analysis
  • Identity resolution against TransUnion's offline identity graph
  • Cross-channel media measurement and attribution
  • Audience targeting and frequency management
  • Data onboarding for CRM and first-party records
  • Household- and individual-level linking
  • Marketing-permissible data use separate from credit files

Verdict

LiveRamp and TransUnion TruAudience both resolve a brand's own customer records into a stable, privacy-conscious identifier, but they start from different kinds of data asset and are built for different primary jobs.

LiveRamp's core product is RampID, a pseudonymous identifier generated from a company's own CRM and offline data, designed specifically to be matched against the same ID held by publishers, platforms and data partners — the value is the size and openness of LiveRamp's connected partner network across DSPs, SSPs and major walled-garden platforms. TruAudience instead draws on TransUnion's existing offline identity graph, built originally for its consumer credit-bureau business but restricted to marketing-permissible data, and bundles cross-channel media measurement and attribution tooling on top of that identity layer rather than positioning identity as a standalone product to connect elsewhere.

Choose LiveRamp if

  • Reach and interoperability across a broad partner network of DSPs, SSPs and ad platforms is the primary goal.
  • You want identity resolution as infrastructure that other best-of-breed tools (measurement, clean rooms) plug into.
  • You're already using or considering LiveRamp Clean Room for collaborative analysis with partners.

Choose TransUnion TruAudience if

  • You want measurement and attribution bundled with identity resolution from one vendor rather than assembled separately.
  • A bureau-backed offline identity graph, distinct from ad-tech-derived data, fits your targeting and frequency-management needs.
  • You're comfortable with the additional compliance scrutiny (FCRA permissible-purpose rules) that comes with a credit-bureau-affiliated data source.

What they share

Both draw on large offline data assets rather than purely cookie- or ad-tech-derived signals, both are quoted per engagement with no public pricing, and both explicitly separate marketing-permissible data from other regulated uses of their parent company's broader data asset (credit files for TransUnion, walled-garden inventory for LiveRamp's partners).

The honest caveat

Neither record here supports a claim that one platform's match rate or graph coverage is objectively larger than the other's — both descriptions are architectural rather than benchmarked. If reach into a specific set of ad platforms or publishers is what you actually need, ask each vendor for named partner overlap with your media plan rather than a general coverage percentage.

Last reviewed September 22, 2026

In the index now