Compare

Vanna AI vs Wren AI

Both are open-source, self-hostable text-to-SQL engines; Vanna trains on schema and example queries, Wren AI needs a governed semantic model defined first.

Side by side

Vanna AI Wren AI
Vendor Vanna AI Canner (Wren AI)
Pricing model Free tier + paid plans Free tier + paid plans
Free tier Yes Yes
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Open source Yes (MIT) Yes (AGPL-3.0)
Best for Engineering teams that want a self-hostable, open-source text-to-SQL engine they can train on their own schema. Engineering teams that want an open-source, self-hostable semantic layer under their AI agents rather than a closed SaaS.
Pricing

Open-source library is free to self-host with your own LLM; Vanna Cloud is a per-month subscription metered by daily question volume, plus a custom-priced Enterprise tier.

Open source (Vanna Core) Free
Explorer $50/month
Team $500/month
Enterprise Custom

Prices read from the vendor's own page on September 21, 2026. Vendors change prices; check the source before you budget.

Free open-source CLI/engine with no UI; hosted Cloud plans are credit-metered monthly subscriptions, and self-hosted Enterprise Plus is custom-quoted with session-based licensing.

Free (Cloud) $0/month
Essential Cloud $179/month, billed annually
Enterprise Cloud $559/month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus (self-hosted) Custom

Prices read from the vendor's own page on September 21, 2026. Vendors change prices; check the source before you budget.

Features
  • Retrieval-augmented generation trained on schema, docs, and example queries
  • Open-source Python library, MIT-licensed
  • Works with hosted LLMs or local models via Ollama
  • Multi-database support (Snowflake, BigQuery, PostgreSQL, and others)
  • Multi-turn follow-up questions
  • Access-controlled hosted admin UI (Vanna Cloud)
  • Automated chart generation from query results
  • Open-source MDL semantic layer defining tables, joins, and metrics
  • Natural-language-to-SQL via a governed context layer, not raw schema
  • Rust/Apache DataFusion query engine, 20+ data source connectors
  • Agentic and classic query modes
  • dbt integration for existing model definitions
  • Embeddable AI API for building custom interfaces
  • Self-hosted deployment for on-prem or air-gapped environments

Verdict

Vanna AI and Wren AI are the two genuinely open-source options in AI analytics assistants, and both can run entirely self-hosted with a local LLM so no query text has to leave your infrastructure. They get to a correct query in different ways. Vanna is retrieval-augmented: you "train" it by feeding schema definitions, documentation, and example question/SQL pairs, and at query time it retrieves the most relevant context and asks an LLM to write SQL from it — accuracy is a direct function of how much and how well-curated that training set is. Wren AI instead asks you to write a Modeling Definition Language (MDL) file up front — tables, joins, and business metrics defined once — and compiles every question against that governed model rather than raw schema plus retrieved examples.

In practice: Vanna is faster to get a first answer out of, because a handful of example queries is enough to start. Wren AI takes more upfront investment to define the MDL, but the result is a portable, inspectable semantic layer that stays consistent as more people ask questions, closer in spirit to what a dedicated semantic layer product offers.

Choose Vanna AI if

  • You want to start fast with a lightweight, example-driven training set rather than a full model definition.
  • Your use case is closer to a single engineering team's internal tool than an organization-wide, governed data-access layer.
  • You want the flexibility to swap in any hosted or local LLM via Ollama without being tied to a specific model.

Choose Wren AI if

  • You want a governed semantic layer — Wren's MDL — that AI agents (and other tools) query consistently, not just an LLM prompted with retrieved examples.
  • You're comfortable investing the setup time to define tables, joins, and metrics once, in exchange for more consistent answers later.
  • You want an embeddable API and dbt integration in the same open-source-rooted platform, with a hosted Cloud tier available if you later want a UI.

The honest caveat

Neither tool is free once you count engineering time: self-hosting either one means someone owns deployment, and Wren AI's MDL in particular is real modeling work, not a configuration checkbox. Both also sell a hosted commercial tier (Vanna Cloud; Wren AI Cloud and Enterprise Plus) that trades that maintenance cost for a subscription — worth comparing against your own build-vs-buy math before committing to the self-hosted route. See text-to-SQL and retrieval-augmented generation for the underlying techniques.

Last reviewed September 22, 2026

In the index now