Compare
Medidata vs Veeva Vault CDMS
Medidata bundles EDC with CTMS, RTSM and safety exchange; Veeva Vault CDMS unifies EDC, coding and cleaning in one application on Vault.
Side by side
| Medidata | Veeva Vault CDMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Dassault Systèmes (Medidata) | Veeva Systems |
| Pricing model | Quote only | Quote only |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Open source | No | No |
| Best for | Sponsors and CROs running regulated, multi-site trials who need a single system of record from data capture through analytics. | Sponsors already standardized on Veeva's Vault platform who want EDC and data cleaning in the same system as clinical operations. |
| Pricing | Priced per study through direct negotiation with Medidata/Dassault Systèmes sales; no public price list. Pricing has not been verified yet — see the vendor's site. | Sold by subscription per study/application as part of Veeva's Vault Clinical Suite; pricing is quoted directly by Veeva. Pricing has not been verified yet — see the vendor's site. |
| Features |
|
|
Verdict
Medidata and Veeva Vault CDMS are the two systems sponsors and CROs compare most often when choosing a system of record for trial data capture. Medidata's Rave EDC sits inside a wider platform — CTMS, randomization and trial supply management (RTSM), safety data exchange, and patient-facing decentralized-trial tools — that together cover a trial's operational lifecycle, acquired and operated as a Dassault Systèmes business unit. Veeva Vault CDMS takes a narrower but more architecturally unified approach: EDC, coding and data cleaning live in a single application built on Veeva's Vault platform, sharing metadata with Veeva's own CTMS, eTMF and safety products rather than integrating with them as separate systems.
The real decision point for many sponsors is which broader ecosystem they're already in. A sponsor already running Veeva CRM, Veeva CTMS or Veeva eTMF gets more from Vault CDMS specifically because of shared Vault metadata across those products. A sponsor with no such Veeva footprint has no equivalent pull toward Medidata beyond its scale and breadth as the more established, widely used platform.
Choose Medidata if
- You want CTMS, RTSM and safety data exchange bundled with EDC under one vendor, without requiring an existing platform commitment.
- Your trial includes decentralized or hybrid patient participation via dedicated patient-facing apps.
- You want AI-assisted data-quality checks layered across a broad operational dataset.
Choose Veeva Vault CDMS if
- You already run Veeva CTMS, eTMF or safety products and want EDC and cleaning to share the same Vault metadata.
- You prefer EDC, coding and cleaning unified in a single application rather than three integrated tools.
- Role-based review and sign-off workflows tied to the same platform as your clinical operations team matter.
What they share
Both are cloud-only, quote-priced per study, and describe GCP, 21 CFR Part 11 and HIPAA-aligned controls as standard. Both are the actual system that runs data capture for a trial, distinguishing them from analytics-only layers like Saama that sit over data already captured. Neither publishes pricing, so budget the study-build and validation effort — not just the license — as part of the real cost. See choosing a clinical trial EDC platform for where Castor's self-service approach fits for smaller studies.
Last reviewed September 22, 2026