Compare

Luzmo vs Qrvey

Luzmo is hosted SaaS priced on usage as adoption grows; Qrvey deploys inside your own cloud account for zero data egress and flat annual licensing.

Side by side

Luzmo Qrvey
Vendor Luzmo Qrvey, Inc.
Pricing model Usage-based Quote only
Free tier No No
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Open source No No
Best for SaaS product teams embedding customer-facing dashboards directly into their own application. SaaS vendors that need embedded analytics deployed inside their own cloud account for data-residency reasons.
Pricing

Single plan starting from a flat monthly platform fee plus usage-based charges for accelerated data rows and AI conversations.

Standard from €1,995/month, billed annually

Prices read from the vendor's own page on September 21, 2026. Vendors change prices; check the source before you budget.

Flat-rate annual licensing across two editions (Pro and Ultra), unlimited users/tenants/dashboards; figures available only on request.

Checked on the vendor's own page on September 21, 2026: no prices are published. Expect to be quoted.

Features
  • White-labeled embedding via API/SDK
  • Multi-tenant row-level security per end customer
  • Self-service dashboard builder for end users
  • AI-generated conversational analytics
  • Data acceleration layer for large datasets
  • Embeddable charts and dashboards as web components
  • Broad connector library to warehouses and databases
  • Usage-based pricing tied to adoption rather than seats
  • Deploys into the customer's own cloud account (single-tenant VPC)
  • Multi-level security: row, column, object, asset and feature
  • White-label dashboard and report builder
  • Optional built-in data engine and transformation layer (Ultra)
  • AI-assisted natural language querying and anomaly detection
  • No-code workflow automation for alerts and actions
  • Zero data egress by default

Verdict

Luzmo (formerly Cumul.io) and Qrvey both target SaaS vendors embedding white-labeled dashboards into a multi-tenant product, and both scope security at the row level per end customer. The real difference is deployment and how each vendor thinks about cost as your own customer base grows. Luzmo is cloud-hosted only, API- and SDK-first, and priced as a single plan combining a flat platform fee with usage-based components — accelerated data rows processed, AI conversations — so cost tracks adoption rather than a fixed seat or embedded-customer count.

Qrvey takes the opposite approach to both deployment and pricing: it runs as Kubernetes containers deployed inside your own AWS, Azure, or GCP account, so tenant data has zero egress by default rather than flowing through a vendor-hosted service, and it prices as flat-rate annual licensing across two editions — Pro, if you already have an analytics-ready database, and Ultra, which bundles a built-in data engine for teams starting from scratch — rather than metering usage.

Choose Luzmo if

  • You want a hosted SaaS product with no infrastructure to deploy or operate yourself.
  • Usage-based pricing tied to actual adoption — rows processed, AI conversations — fits your own product economics better than a flat license.
  • You want AI-generated conversational analytics and a data-acceleration layer built in.

Choose Qrvey if

  • Zero data egress, with tenant data staying inside your own cloud account, is a requirement your customers' security teams will actually ask about.
  • You'd rather budget a predictable flat annual license than a usage-metered bill that scales with adoption.
  • You want the option to start from an existing database (Pro) or let the platform bring its own data engine (Ultra).

What they share

Neither publishes exact dollar pricing without a quote in Qrvey's case, though Luzmo's Standard plan starts publicly at roughly €1,995/month billed annually; both support multi-tenant white-labeling and both connect to common warehouses and databases (Snowflake, PostgreSQL, and others) as sources. Deployment model is the decision that should come first here — pricing comparison only makes sense once you know whether your customers require in-your-account hosting. See embedded analytics and row-level security for background.

Last reviewed September 22, 2026

In the index now