Compare
Botify vs Oncrawl
Both pair crawl data with real log files for large sites; Botify is the higher-touch enterprise platform, Oncrawl the more self-contained analytics tool.
Side by side
| Botify | Oncrawl | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Botify | Oncrawl SAS |
| Pricing model | Quote only | Quote only |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Open source | No | No |
| Best for | Large enterprises managing millions of URLs that need crawl and log data combined at scale. | Technical SEO teams on large sites who need crawl data cross-referenced with real bot log files. |
| Pricing | Fully custom, quote-based enterprise contracts; no self-serve pricing or free trial is published. Checked on the vendor's own page on September 21, 2026: no prices are published. Expect to be quoted. | Plans differentiated by monthly crawl and log-line volume; the vendor's own pricing page could not be read in this session. Pricing has not been verified yet — see the vendor's site. |
| Features |
|
|
Verdict
Botify and Oncrawl solve the same problem — combining a simulated crawl with a site's actual server logs so a technical SEO team can see what Googlebot really visits, not just what's theoretically crawlable — and both target large, complex sites like e-commerce catalogs and publishers. Botify positions itself around dedicated onboarding and strategy support alongside the platform, reflecting its focus on the largest organizations with SEO engineering teams. Oncrawl reads as a more self-directed analytics tool: strong API access for exporting data into your own BI stack, without the same emphasis on white-glove account management.
Choose Botify if
- You want vendor-provided strategy support and onboarding as part of the contract, not just software.
- Your organization already runs other enterprise SEO tooling and can absorb another quote-based procurement process.
- You need AI-crawler (LLM bot) visit tracking alongside traditional search-engine crawl data.
Choose Oncrawl if
- You want to pipe crawl and log data into your own BigQuery or Looker Studio setup via API rather than relying mainly on vendor dashboards.
- Your team is technical enough to self-serve rather than needing structured onboarding.
- You need JavaScript rendering and structured-data auditing alongside the log-file work.
What they share
Both scale pricing by monthly crawl-URL and log-line volume rather than by seat, both compete most directly with Lumar in the enterprise log-file-analysis segment, and both are built around the same core idea: a crawl alone tells you what's crawlable, but only logs tell you what a bot actually did — see crawl budget. Neither publishes self-serve pricing, so get quotes from both before committing. For lighter-weight options, see how to choose a technical SEO crawler.
The honest caveat
Oncrawl's own pricing page could not be verified at the time of writing — confirm current tiers directly with the vendor rather than assuming parity with Botify's published quote process.
Last reviewed September 22, 2026