Compare

Adyen vs Checkout.com

Both are global processors whose analytics come bundled with the merchant relationship; the real difference is pricing transparency and cost breakdown.

Side by side

Adyen Checkout.com
Vendor Adyen N.V. Checkout.com
Pricing model Usage-based Quote only
Free tier No No
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Open source No No
Best for Merchants processing through Adyen who want built-in transaction and authorization analytics without a separate tool. Merchants processing through Checkout.com who want transparent Interchange++ cost reporting alongside processing.
Pricing

Per-transaction pricing (fixed fee plus a payment-method-specific fee); no separate charge for analytics/reporting, which is bundled.

Per transaction $0.13 processing fee + payment-method fee

Prices read from the vendor's own page on September 21, 2026. Vendors change prices; check the source before you budget.

Flat-rate or Interchange++ pricing negotiated per merchant by business profile and risk category; no public per-transaction figures.

Pricing has not been verified yet — see the vendor's site.

Features
  • Real-time transaction and settlement reporting
  • Authorization-rate analytics and RevenueAccelerate recommendations
  • Chargeback and dispute reporting
  • Cross-channel (in-person + online) reporting
  • Reporting API and scheduled report exports
  • Custom dashboards in the Customer Area
  • Risk and fraud rule performance reporting
  • Authorization-rate monitoring and optimization
  • Interchange++ transparent cost breakdown per transaction
  • Transaction and settlement reporting dashboard
  • Chargeback and dispute reporting
  • Risk and fraud rule performance data
  • Reporting API
  • Multi-currency reconciliation reporting

Verdict

Adyen and Checkout.com are both global payment processors whose analytics live inside the merchant dashboard that comes with your processing account, not a separate product — so this isn't really a "which analytics tool" decision so much as a "which processor" decision that happens to include reporting. Both cover authorization rates, transaction and settlement detail, and chargeback reporting for whatever volume runs through that processor specifically; neither sees transactions from any other processor you might also use, which is what Pagos is for.

The clearest difference in the records is pricing structure and transparency. Adyen publishes a per-transaction rate card — a fixed processing fee plus a payment-method-specific fee — directly on its site. Checkout.com negotiates flat-rate or Interchange++ pricing per merchant based on business profile and risk category, with no public figures, but its dashboard is built specifically to show the interchange, scheme and processor cost of each transaction broken out rather than blended — useful if cost transparency after the fact matters more to you than a published rate up front.

Choose Adyen if

  • You want to see a public, if generic, pricing structure before you talk to sales.
  • You value Adyen's RevenueAccelerate recommendations for lifting authorization rates alongside the standard reporting.
  • Cross-channel reporting, in-person plus online, in one dashboard matters to your business.

Choose Checkout.com if

  • You want a transparent per-transaction breakdown of interchange, scheme and processor cost (Interchange++), not a blended rate.
  • You're comfortable negotiating pricing directly rather than starting from a public rate card.
  • Your priority is authorization-rate monitoring and optimization tools built into the same dashboard.

What they share

Both are cloud-only, priced at the processor level with no separate analytics fee — reporting is part of what you're already paying to process transactions. Neither aggregates data from other processors; if you run both, or either alongside others, see Pagos for a cross-processor view. For the wider category, see choosing a payments analytics platform.

Last reviewed September 22, 2026

In the index now